Yardi Breeze
Small to mid-size property managers who want an affordable, easy-to-learn platform with a path to grow into Yardi's enterprise ecosystem
Propertyware
Established single-family property management companies with 250+ units that need deep reporting and customization
Score Comparison
Pricing & Features
Making Your Decision
When to Choose Yardi Breeze
Small to mid-size property managers who want an affordable, easy-to-learn platform with a path to grow into Yardi's enterprise ecosystem
Yardi Breeze offers the best value proposition for operators who want enterprise backing without enterprise complexity. Zero setup fees and no training costs make it the lowest-risk entry point. Its accounting limitations are real, but for straightforward portfolio management it delivers significant capability per dollar.
Strengths
- Lowest total cost of ownership — no setup, training, or support fees on any plan
- Easy to learn even for non-technical users, with a clean simplified interface
- Backed by Yardi Systems (40+ years in property tech) with upgrade path to Yardi Voyager
- All-in-one solution covering financials, tenant management, maintenance, and marketing
Limitations
- Accounting capabilities are notably weaker than competitors for complex multi-entity operations
- Reporting is limited — Bill Pay reports lack payee names, restricted drill-down options
- Customer support is inconsistent — sometimes excellent, sometimes unresponsive
When to Choose Propertyware
Established single-family property management companies with 250+ units that need deep reporting and customization
Propertyware dominates the single-family rental management niche with powerful reporting and customization. However, reliability issues, a steep learning curve, and high minimums make it a poor fit for small landlords or those expecting a plug-and-play experience.
Strengths
- Purpose-built for single-family property management — the industry leader in this niche
- Best-in-class reporting module with highly customizable reports and custom fields
- Open API and flexible workflows for tailoring the platform to specific operations
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing with clear tier breakdowns
Limitations
- Steep learning curve with persistent bugs and slow resolution times reported by users
- $250/month minimum plus implementation fees make it expensive for smaller portfolios
- Performance issues and system crashes frustrate daily users
