Asana Review
Asana excels at helping teams manage interconnected work across departments, with powerful portfolio management and timeline features that provide clarity on how projects relate to company goals.
Asana Review
Asana excels at helping teams manage interconnected work across departments, with powerful portfolio management and timeline features that provide clarity on how projects relate to company goals.
Asana Review
Asana excels at helping teams manage interconnected work across departments, with powerful portfolio management and timeline features that provide clarity on how projects relate to company goals.
Asana Pros & Cons
Pros
- Generous free tier with unlimited projects and tasks
- Best-in-class timeline view for project planning
- Portfolios feature for tracking multiple projects at once
- Strong workflow automation with Rules
- Excellent cross-functional team collaboration features
Cons
- Learning curve for utilizing full feature set
- No built-in time tracking (requires integration)
- Premium features like Goals and Portfolios require paid plans
- Can become cluttered without proper organization
Overview
Asana emerged from Facebook's internal tools and carries that DNA, built for teams coordinating complex, interdependent work across multiple projects and departments. Where some PM tools focus on individual task management, Asana's strength lies in showing how work connects: which projects depend on which, how team workloads balance, and whether company goals are actually progressing.
The platform has evolved significantly from its early days as a task list. Today's Asana includes timeline planning, portfolio management, goals tracking, and workload balancing. For organizations struggling to answer "what's the status of everything?" Asana provides genuine clarity.
What sets Asana apart isn't any single feature, it's the cohesion. Tasks belong to projects, projects live in portfolios, portfolios connect to goals. This hierarchy creates visibility that's hard to achieve by stitching together separate tools. When it works, teams spend less time in status meetings and more time actually doing work.
Features Deep-Dive
Task and Project Management
Asana's task management is comprehensive without being overwhelming. Tasks support subtasks, assignees, due dates, custom fields, dependencies, and attachments. The detail view feels like a document, with rich descriptions, comments, and activity history.
Projects can be viewed as lists, boards, timelines, or calendars, same data, different visualizations. The timeline view is particularly well-executed, offering Gantt-style planning with drag-and-drop simplicity. Dependencies are visualized with connecting lines, making it clear when one task blocks another.
Multi-homing is a clever Asana concept: a single task can live in multiple projects without duplication. This reflects real work, a marketing deliverable might belong to both the product launch project and the marketing team's ongoing workstream.
Portfolios and Goals
This is where Asana differentiates itself. Portfolios let you monitor multiple projects in one view, with status updates, progress tracking, and workload distribution across the portfolio. For managers overseeing many projects, this eliminates the need to check each project individually.
Goals connect high-level objectives to the actual projects and tasks that deliver them. When someone completes a task, that progress automatically reflects in parent projects and connected goals. This bottom-up progress tracking is genuinely useful for organizations adopting OKR frameworks.
The caveat: Portfolios and Goals require Business tier ($24.99/user/month), which significantly increases costs. Many teams find themselves on the free tier, see the portfolio demo, and then face sticker shock.
Automation and Rules
Asana's Rules automate routine work, moving tasks when status changes, assigning work based on form submissions, sending notifications at key milestones. The rule builder is visual but less intuitive than Monday's automation recipes.
Custom rules require some learning, but the pre-built templates cover common scenarios. Integration with Zapier extends automation possibilities for complex workflows spanning multiple tools.
Rules are available on Premium and above, with the free tier limited to basic task management.
Pricing Analysis
Asana's pricing structure rewards patience. The free Basic tier supports up to 10 users with unlimited tasks and projects, genuinely usable for small teams. This is more generous than Monday's 2-seat limit and makes Asana a legitimate option for startups and small businesses.
Premium at $10.99/user/month adds timeline, workflow builder, forms, and advanced search. Starter tier (newer pricing) at $10.99/user/month is similar. Business at $24.99/user/month unlocks portfolios, goals, workload management, and approvals, the features that distinguish Asana for larger organizations.
Enterprise pricing requires a conversation but adds admin controls, custom branding, and priority support.
For a 20-person team, costs range from $0 (Basic) to $220/month (Premium) to $500/month (Business). The jump to Business is significant, but portfolios and goals often justify it for organizations with multiple concurrent projects.
Asana's free tier makes it one of the most accessible tools to start with, even if growth eventually requires paid plans.
Who Is This For?
Asana excels for:
- Cross-functional teams coordinating work that spans departments (marketing, product, design working together)
- Organizations with multiple concurrent projects who need portfolio-level visibility
- Companies adopting OKRs or goal frameworks that want automatic progress tracking
- Teams of 10-100 people who've outgrown simpler tools but don't need enterprise complexity
- Remote teams who benefit from async-friendly features like task comments and project updates
Asana's sweet spot is organizations where work crosses boundaries, multiple teams contributing to shared outcomes, projects with complex dependencies, work that needs coordination rather than just tracking.
Who Should NOT Use This
Asana might frustrate you if:
- You're a very small team (under 5 people): Asana's power comes from coordination features. A tiny team might find it overkill when Trello or Todoist would suffice.
- You need built-in time tracking: Asana lacks native time tracking, requiring integrations like Harvest or Clockify. For agencies billing by the hour, Teamwork or Monday might be more complete solutions.
- You want maximum features at minimum cost: ClickUp includes more features on cheaper plans. If feature-per-dollar is your metric, Asana loses that comparison.
- You prefer visual, colorful interfaces: Asana's design is clean and professional but not as vibrant as Monday.com. Teams who love Monday's aesthetic often find Asana sterile.
- You're highly technical/engineering-focused: Asana works for engineering but lacks the deep integrations with development tools that Jira or Linear provide. Sprint planning exists but feels adapted rather than native.
Bottom Line
Asana delivers genuine value for organizations managing interconnected work. The portfolio and goals features provide visibility that's hard to replicate with other tools, and the free tier is generous enough to start without financial risk. For cross-functional teams who need to see how everything connects, Asana remains a top choice.
The learning curve is moderate, more than Trello, less than Jira, and the interface stays out of your way once you're familiar. Just budget for Business tier if portfolio management is your goal; that's where Asana's differentiation lives.
FAQ
How does Asana compare to Monday.com?
Both are excellent tools serving similar markets. Monday emphasizes visual appeal and ease of use with colorful, intuitive boards. Asana emphasizes cross-project coordination with portfolios and goals. Monday's automations are more accessible; Asana's are more powerful once learned. Asana's free tier (10 users) beats Monday's (2 users). Monday feels more modern; Asana feels more professional. Try both, the better choice depends on which interface resonates with your team.
Is Asana free tier actually usable?
Yes, Asana's free Basic tier is genuinely functional. You get unlimited tasks and projects, list and board views, assignees and due dates, and file attachments for up to 10 users. Missing features include timeline view, custom fields, forms, and advanced search. Many small teams operate successfully on the free tier indefinitely. The ceiling is higher than most competitor free tiers.
Can Asana handle Agile/Scrum workflows?
Moderately well. Asana supports board views that work as Kanban boards, and you can set up sprints as projects with due date ranges. However, it lacks native sprint planning, velocity tracking, and burndown charts that dedicated Agile tools provide. For development teams doing serious Scrum, Jira remains the standard. For organizations with development work alongside other functions, Asana's flexibility often works well enough.
Does Asana integrate with Slack?
Yes, the Asana-Slack integration is well-developed. You can create tasks from Slack messages, get notifications in Slack when tasks update, and view task details without leaving Slack. The integration is included in all plans. For Slack-centric organizations, this makes Asana feel like a natural extension of existing workflows.
What happens when we outgrow the free tier?
Upgrading is seamless, your data and setup remain intact. You'll immediately gain access to premium features like timeline view, custom fields, and workflow automation. Pricing is per-user, so you can calculate exact costs before committing. Asana offers a 30-day free trial of Business tier to test premium features before paying.
Who Is Asana Best For?
Cross-functional teams managing complex, multi-project portfolios
The Bottom Line
Asana excels at helping teams manage interconnected work across departments, with powerful portfolio management and timeline features that provide clarity on how projects relate to company goals.
Try Asana TodayKey Specs
Scoring Breakdown
User interface intuitiveness, learning curve, onboarding experience, and overall accessibility for users of varying technical abilities.
Depth and breadth of functionality including task management, views (Kanban, Gantt, calendar), automation, reporting, and customization options.
Team communication features, real-time editing, commenting, notifications, file sharing, and guest access capabilities.
Cost relative to features provided, transparency of pricing, availability of free tier, and scalability as your team grows.
Third-party app connectivity, API quality and documentation, ecosystem depth, and native integrations with popular business tools.