MailerLite Wins
Winner
MailerLite logo

MailerLite

8.4

Small businesses and startups wanting affordability without sacrificing usability

VS
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

7.8

Small businesses and nonprofits that prioritize ease of use and support

Sarah Chen
Sarah Chen

Score Comparison

Criteria
MailerLite
Constant Contact
Overall Score
8.4
7.8
Automation
8.0
7.2
Ease of Use
9.5
8.8
Features
8.0
7.5
Deliverability
8.5
8.0
Pricing/Value
9.2
7.2

Pricing & Features

Specification
MailerLite
Constant Contact
Starting Price
Free / $10/mo
$12/mo
Free Tier
Pricing Model
Freemium
Subscription

Making Your Decision

MailerLite logo

When to Choose MailerLite

Small businesses and startups wanting affordability without sacrificing usability

MailerLite delivers impressive value with its affordable pricing and clean interface, offering an ideal balance of features and simplicity for budget-conscious marketers.

Strengths

  • Exceptionally affordable pricing for paid tiers
  • Clean, intuitive interface that's easy to learn
  • Generous free plan with 1,000 subscribers
  • Excellent email and landing page builders

Limitations

  • Strict approval process for new accounts
  • Fewer integrations than larger competitors
  • Advanced features only on higher tiers
Constant Contact logo

When to Choose Constant Contact

Small businesses and nonprofits that prioritize ease of use and support

Constant Contact remains a solid choice for beginners with its exceptional support and ease of use, though more sophisticated marketers will find its automation and features limiting.

Strengths

  • Extremely beginner-friendly interface
  • Excellent customer support with phone option
  • Event management and registration features
  • Strong template library for various industries

Limitations

  • Limited automation capabilities
  • Higher pricing for fewer features than competitors
  • A/B testing limited to subject lines

Ready to Get Started?

MailerLite logo

MailerLite

Score: 8.4
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

Score: 7.8